• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    There is a point to having both - or at least giving an idea of how much an item typically weighs. One cookie might be 200g or 50g; people may typically reach for 1-5 cookies, for example.

    A misleading serving size (eg “per 1/4 cookie”) is indeed not helpful at all, but I don’t think it’s illegal.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So many single-use packets which barely contain enough for half a meal, yet say “contains 2 servings” so they can halve all the numbers on the nutrition label. Yes, this is in america.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        They had to stop doing this for drinks (at least). They now show the whole bottle contents and sometimes also servings for some sizes.

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I don’t think a serving is supposed to be a meal. Pretty sure it’s talking about like, the food pyramid. It’s not a thing anymore but you gotta get a certain amount of grains and fruit and veg and dairy and you count the amounts by serving size.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay, but let’s say you have 35g of sauce. It’s labeled as 2 servings that equal x calories. Easy math to figure out what you ate.

        When 100g is x calories and you have to do the math it’s a bit more annoying. Even worse when you have to break out the scale.