Ah yeah everyone that critiques ML communism has to be fascist. Social democrats, anarchists, non ML marxists etc just seem to non existent when MLs try to defend their propaganda. Pretty weak reply tbh
It’s very funny that you guys have adopted the 2015 chud thing of saying “you lefties just call anyone a fascist!” While explicitly repeating fascist talking points.
Its so funny that your exact argument is mentioned and refuted in the linked video in my original comment. Feel free to watch it, its made in good faith from someone who would love to see MLs actually engage with their historical revisionism.
If you can’t even advocate for your uselessly myopic worldview yourself, why should anyone else do it for you? If you have something of substance to say, say it. Say anything that isn’t standard internet argument-pattern vagueposting or sweeping incorrect generalizations .
So me repeating the same talking point someone else made already more eloquently is somehow better than pointing to it so someone can engage with it in its most effective form? I am not a robot, no thanks, feel free to watch the video. If you need help to find the relevant section, I can provide time stamps.
Ah yeah everyone that critiques ML communism has to be fascist. Social democrats, anarchists, non ML marxists etc just seem to non existent when MLs try to defend their propaganda. Pretty weak reply tbh
It’s very funny that you guys have adopted the 2015 chud thing of saying “you lefties just call anyone a fascist!” While explicitly repeating fascist talking points.
Well you actually do call everyone fascist, even (other) antifascists, as can be easily seen two comments further up …
“Everyone”
Every time
Its so funny that your exact argument is mentioned and refuted in the linked video in my original comment. Feel free to watch it, its made in good faith from someone who would love to see MLs actually engage with their historical revisionism.
If you can’t even advocate for your uselessly myopic worldview yourself, why should anyone else do it for you? If you have something of substance to say, say it. Say anything that isn’t standard internet argument-pattern vagueposting or sweeping incorrect generalizations .
So me repeating the same talking point someone else made already more eloquently is somehow better than pointing to it so someone can engage with it in its most effective form? I am not a robot, no thanks, feel free to watch the video. If you need help to find the relevant section, I can provide time stamps.