• BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        “Quantity of links” is not a metric for actual evidence, because most of those links are just duplicating the same dubious claims

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Check those sources. Adrian Zenz, HRW, Pentagon press, ASPCI, and various other US government employees / US and UK state media. Wikipedia is not neutral, its run by US government agents like Katherine Maher, and acts as a spokesman for pro-US / imperialist talking points, and their admins silence anyone who goes against that narrative.

        https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia

        • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I’m aware that this information wouldn’t be so interesting to the present apparatus of Western hegemony if it wasn’t to their advantage to spread it. There are plenty of atrocities the US supports directly which tend not to get as much news coverage. I chose Wikipedia because it’s a general amalgam of hundreds of different compromised sources rather than link any individual news source or government office. I have yet to see any evidence that contradicts what these highly biased sources say, only that I should believe a different biased source offering no evidence at all because the US is more evil (It is more evil, I agree).