Meta was paying out-and-out neo-Nazis to post on Facebook, an investigation from Australia’s ABC News found.

These pages and individual creators posted content that appeared to be in clear violation of Facebook’s own hate speech policies. Nonetheless, they were able to earn money on their posts through the platform’s “Content Monetization” program — which is invitation-only.

One receiving payouts from Meta was Hugo Lennon, a known far-right agitator and white nationalist with ties to neo-Nazi groups. Lennon was taken away by police for hurling racial abuse at India’s prime minister Narendra Modi during his stay at a Melbourne hotel, and is believed to be one of the organizers behind an “anti-immigration” march on a sacred Indigenous site in the city last year.

Lennon, in other words, was a known quantity, and Meta should’ve been under no illusions about who they were paying to drive engagement on the platform. Still, the investigation found that he’s been receiving payments from Facebook since September 2025.

Meanwhile, the Facebook page for the Australian white supremacist site The Noticer has been making money through the revenue program since November 2025. Underscoring how much Meta has dropped the ball on this one, even X — owned by Elon Musk, who performed two suspiciously Sieg Heil-looking salutes back in 2025 — has banned The Noticer for violating its “hateful profile policy.”

  • TehPers@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “Such speech may be offensive to many, but it is not Meta’s role to police offensiveness,” the company added.

    I don’t really know what else to write here because the quote is already enough. Anyway, if anyone still had any doubts about Meta for some reason, there you go.

    • Kissaki@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The statement alone is already very problematic, but even worse when you put it next to their own written policies.

      These pages and individual creators posted content that appeared to be in clear violation of Facebook’s own hate speech policies.

  • petrescatraian@libranet.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    One of the other advantages Friendica has over Facebook: they’re not paying outright nazis to post on the platform.

    • DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The disadvantage is that this is the first time I’ve heard of Friendica (and I usually hear about these kinds of things much earlier).

      • petrescatraian@libranet.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Fair. Friendica stayed well below the radar for pretty much the entire time, even though it sounded a bit familiar for me when I created this account a few years back, and it is also kinda the oldest platform in the Fediverse.

        It has many of the features that regular Facebook has, like creation and attending to groups (even this Lemmy community is displayed as a group) as well as events and pages, but also some extra stuff non-privacy related like following RSS feeds directly, as well as supporting BB Code for formatting your text pretty much everywhere (in your posts, comments, in your profile descriptions or in the event descriptions). Not only it supports ActivityPub, but it also supports Diaspora and RSS (as said) and Tumblr and Bluesky (if you have an account there). Server admins can also install add-ons which add all sorts of extra functionality - from compatibility with other networks (with Tumblr, Bluesky or WordPress) to stuff like content filter or collapsing posts if they are not displayed in a language of your choosing (stuff that Facebook, again, doesn’t have).

        And of course, it is not owned by Meta, nor it has the privacy invasive features of it, nor it does spy you across the web whether you have an account on it or not, nor does it pump billions into failed projects like the Metaverse only to later pull the plug, nor it invests into AI projects or spy glasses.

        If you’re more curious about it, I wrote a handy guide myself here a while ago (I’m not involved into the development of it, but this was the best way I could contribute - and sorry for the Google site). There’s a server list here where you can pick your server (if you want a recommendation, pick friendica.world for the largest server, or loma.ml for a bigger selection of add-ons) and a video guide on both YouTube and [https://peertube.stream/w/p/4K4MWYXMEYUtVDqKjjq4Uu?playlistPosition=1]PeerTube](https://peertube.stream/w/p/4K4MWYXMEYUtVDqKjjq4Uu?playlistPosition=1) if you’re feeling a bit overwhelmed. And there’s a support group at !helpers

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Edit: oh derp, somehow I entirely misread your message as that you had not heard of Friendica’s entire existence. Sorry, ignore this if you like, or perhaps it’s interesting in a different manner now. 😜

        Your instance is quite a bit cut off from the rest of the Fediverse, although even so the news of Friendica has made waves - e.g. https://beehaw.org/post/521802 with >800 comments.

        Friendica is fairly niche though, and suffers from a lot of problems. For one, as a Facebook replacement it relies upon your family members and close friend group to also use it - but unless you act as tech support and install it onto their machines for them (alongside Linux and everything needed for them to self-host), then how else will you be able to communicate with them on that platform?

        And it more or less does need to be either self-hosted or at least hosted exceedingly often, since it does not scale well and users of the project have started begging for technical support from outsiders (not a great example of the latter but see this informational post).

        In short, there are reasons for its lack of spread so far. I do not know if those issues are solvable - though by now perhaps they already have been? It’s just a very different model from the more semi-anonymous platforms like the Fediverse, which can make things challenging.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The irony is, of course, that Nazis will spread their inbred BS for free. So Meta are the suckers for giving them a platform and a paycheck.