• minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Meta competitors. The fact you swallowed the “creep glasses” pr narrative and now want them banned is ridiculous given the creepy ass shit all these companies are already doing. Like, google home is listening to all your private conversations FFS, but that’s less creepy?

    • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If you re-read my comment you’ll see I made no distinction between the levels of creepy in all the pervert devices.

      But, I can simplify for you: it’s true that having a company/government spy on you is expected in this day and age, but that doesn’t mean it is acceptable. Home devices can be avoided if you care for your privacy. People buying camera glasses and wearing them in public, willingly turning themselves into walking IPTV cameras controlled by one of the shadiest data scooping companies in the world, are the very definition of useful idiots.

      • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Have you ever described any other device similar to ‘creep device’? Probably not, or rarely ever.

        • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well, as you ignored that I just did it for like 4 different whole things which all existed before the Meta x RayBan Childsnappers, then I guess you’ll just keep creating your own conflicting narrative as a direct reply. So, sure, I’ve never called any technology creepy before.