nature_man [he/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 13 days agoRulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1203arrow-down12
arrow-up1201arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.blahaj.zonenature_man [he/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareBjörn@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·12 days agoWill be hard to find an unbiased non-pet scientist.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7·12 days agoI was going to say I could do it just fine, but then I remembered I do hold subs in a certain level of condescending contempt, just the way they want it.
minus-squaredjsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·12 days agohonestly that’s fine, I’m pretty sure the ethics boards have agreed you’re allowed a lil bit of contempt for your lab ra- I mean test subjects.
Will be hard to find an unbiased non-pet scientist.
I was going to say I could do it just fine, but then I remembered I do hold subs in a certain level of condescending contempt, just the way they want it.
honestly that’s fine, I’m pretty sure the ethics boards have agreed you’re allowed a lil bit of contempt for your lab ra- I mean test subjects.