For me MPV is the best.

  • turip@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Since I switched to linux, I have only used mpv. It is far more costumizable, has a ton of keybinds. Also in my expirience it has a lot less bugs, however my usecase is pretty common.

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    mpv, it just fits me better, I don’t really do playlists for videos outside of the TV, where I’ve got kodi.

    I launch many videos from the terminal, since sometimes big AV1 videos need my big GPU (DRI_PRIME)

  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I developed a habit of using VLC because the installation included a lot of codecs. Probably not as important today as it was years ago, but it’s a habit now.

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Despite MPV being simpler VLC usually has less problems to play something than MPV. I don’t really like VLC’s interface, but I DO like how powerful it is without having to read any manuals.

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fun fact: VLC still supports Android 4.2 (Nov, 2012) which i use to play local media on my old tablet(4.4) through f-droid. Works well with old formats.

    On PC, I use MPV because I’ve gotten used to its command line and shortcuts.

  • dingleberrylover@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    VLC is great and I had been using it for years. However, MPV is simple, yet powerful and is naturally part of my Linux distribution due to being a dependency of other stuff I use. That said, MPV has been my go-to mediaplayer for years now.

  • AcornTickler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    While VLC is great, I have had cases where it failed me regarding hardware accelerated decoding. mpv has never let me down with this.

  • madthumbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    VLC is bloated garbage that takes ~5x more space because of the added crap that’s better done by avidemux. Even mpv + avidemux smaller than VLC. MPVs config file seems more reliable than VLC menus that are frustrating AF to navigate (especially when they don’t work).

  • anivicivokki@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I like the simplicity of MPV and use it whenever I can. However, it does not work as a DLNA client, at least not natively. I keep VLC nearby for such cases.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    In the 15 years I have used vlc there has only been one file it couldn’t play and so I have had no need to try another player.

    • thakur0@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Its not about only playing a video, its about more things too, like, colours, decoding etc

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Ever since VLC came on the scene it has been my go-to. Just a really functional player that plays almost anything I throw at it, and I like the UI well enough. For now I have no reason to use anything else. I’m not hating on other players, but VLC works for me.

    • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Every time I find a new file format I just huck it at VLC to see what it’ll do. Most times nothing, but some interesting results have been observed.