A public service should be a net profit in standards of living of the people who make up the public.
And i proclaim that nuclear power plants dont do that in the long term.
They drain the public out of resources that could have been invested in better solutions that dont come with the downsides of radio active waste products.
I’ll admit I don’t know much about the polluting effects of nuclear, but wouldn’t it be considered a net benefit in regards to the devastatingly expensive damage of climate change compared to burning coal and gas?
A public service should be a net profit in standards of living of the people who make up the public. And i proclaim that nuclear power plants dont do that in the long term. They drain the public out of resources that could have been invested in better solutions that dont come with the downsides of radio active waste products.
I’ll admit I don’t know much about the polluting effects of nuclear, but wouldn’t it be considered a net benefit in regards to the devastatingly expensive damage of climate change compared to burning coal and gas?
Nobody is comparing them to coal or gas for better alternatives already exist.