• ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      I’d had a dedicated windows drive for a little while… Maybe a bug and not malice, but the forced Windows 8 -> 10 upgrade deleted everything on my second drive that windows wasn’t installed on

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I had two disks and windows still fucked my secure boot keys somehow in a way that I wasn’t able to fix so I had to reinstall the linux side. I turned secure boot off afterwards so should be fine now but it was a thing that happened.

  • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    i’ve quadbooted a lot before (linux/freebsd/osx/windows), it works pretty well these days with uefi. was pretty hard to handle with legacy bios though

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Linux supported hardware” is an outdated phrase only used in windows propaganda today.

    • Zenorbi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      For desktop? Probably. For laptop, linux support can be awful, because manufacturers keep introducing hardware that don’t support standard drivers. Webcam? How about an IPU6 that needs kernel modules just to be detected and then special calibration files just so the image is not a stripey corrupted mess… How about no on-board sound because screw you I guess. How about a non standard USB controller so that you cannot even communicate over your USB ethernet dongle when the wifi is once again some special sauce non standard shit…

      These are Dell and Lenovo Yoga machines at the University I work at. Some are absolute garbage where the USB is always powered and will drain the battery when the computer is turned off and no BIOS setting will disable this.

      We are now looking into Tuxedo and Framework…

      PS.: even windows has issues with these, where you have no touchpad and no USB anything (mouse, keyboard) until you somehow install a driver…

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Asus Zenbook DUO

          I’ll be honest, A lot more of it works than I expected. Linux runs and is quite stable.

          Keyboard Backlighting? Had to write some Python. Windows driver manages this, proprietary. I still can’t get backlight to work in bluetooth mode.

          Trackpad Palm Rejection? Had to write a service. Windows driver manages this, proprietary.

          Function keys on the keyboard in wired mode? Not supported, no work-around that I can find. I have to remove the keyboard and put it into bluetooth mode. Windows driver.

        • ExtraMedicated@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’ve got a SpaceMouse Pro that, although useable with Blender, I haven’t been able to get it working as well as it did on windows, but I think that’s the only device I had any trouble with so far.

        • delcaran@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Broadcom hardware (WiFi cards an webcams in particular). Plus there are quirks with some proprietary driver version not building against some kernel version…

          With unsupported hardware and closed drivers you are always on the lookout for some breakage.

          And it’s not a Linux problem nor a complaint on distro maintainers. It’s manufacturers that are shit.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Certain fingerprint readers and touchscreens

          ex. Goodix

          It’s not the fault of Linux, it’s the hardware manufacturers. Still, you need to consider it before buying the device

        • hakase@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          HP Reverb G2 for me. Still waiting on Monado to get it fully working but no such luck yet. Hugely appreciative to the dev team for all of their amazing work, of course.

          • marcos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            In my experience, the only OS where printers won’t have drivers is Windows.

            But I don’t deal often with dark demoniac systems, so there are probably lots of niche hellish devices that I don’t know the details.

                • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  Maybe 5 years old, haven’t tested in a while but it’s USB only with no network connectivity

              • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Epson seems to supply Linux drivers according to their website and some Linux users when I searched around

              • bonn2@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                I was able to get mine working by setting it up as a network printer via windows and then just accessing it like that through Linux. But yeah, if I ever change wifi ssids I would need to factory reset it go back into windows and configure it again. (ET2400)

                • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  I also had a windows server for that for a little bit, but dumped it in the end. Realistically only my wife is using it, and she is still stuck with windows on her Thinkpad

            • newton@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              They work better on Linux ,more prints than on windows ,same Cartwright. Installing was plug play (Office jet 6950)

        • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Peripheral devices, mostly. I have some half-supported, like Logitech mouse (G-shift doesn’t work), and for some I rely on open-source devs (like Corsair keyboard for certain keys/modes/connectivity fix). Sure, you can say just buy compatible devices, but it’s not always viable to replace everything you owned before moving to Linux.

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I’ve got some LianLi case fans that aren’t supported by anything Linux that I’ve been able to find. I run a barebones VM just to control their features.

            • iamthetot@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Off the top of my head, my case is a LianLi O11, but I was talking about my case fans, which are… Oh lord, their naming is so obnoxious, the… TM LCDs I think?

              • Mike_The_TV@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                lconnect just isn’t linux friendly, which is kinda surprising. I’ve got the 8.8 universal screen, which I could just toggle into a second display and get all the system data that way when running under linux.

                • iamthetot@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Oh yeah I gave up trying to run LConnect on linux a while ago. I then looked into alternative tools people have made, of which there are a few and they seem great, but none of which (when I looked last) support my specific fan models. So my current solution is Windows 11 in a barebones VM that autostarts. It literally just runs Lconnect and nothing else, and the only things passed through to it are the USB controls for the fans. It has allowed me to at least control the colours, and screens, though not fan profiles or stats.

        • delcaran@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          My case: I have an nvidia GTX 980. It’s old but it’s what I have.

          Nvidia dropped its support from driver version 595.

          Driver 580 is what I need, it worked until 7.0 but no longer in 7.1 (was using Fedora 44). Since my hardware is old I switched to Debian Trixie.

          Another example is the facetime HD Webcam of macbook pro: to make it work you have to install OSx or download a recovery image, compile a C program to extract a specific binary blob, then use that blob to recompile the driver on your kernel.

          There are lots of examples: it’s a big world, with lots of hardware and mostly no producer interested in the Linux world.

          • CubitOom@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            This depends a bit on the distro you are using. Like in arch you should not use the proprietary drivers for older cards but the open ones. My guess is there are some community drivers you should use instead.

    • funkajunk 🇨🇦@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Unfortunately this is not true. If manufacturers do not support Linux, then it is up to dedicated community members to reverse engineer drivers. Much love to these amazing people ❤️

      Things have gotten much better in recent years because now Linux is seen as a legitimate operating system and not just a platform for hobbyists.

    • uuj8za@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Psht. I wish! This is wrong and will set people up for failure. There is absolutely hardware that will work well with Linux and hardware that will not.

      I tend to run into problems with brand new laptops. Microphones don’t work, web cams don’t work, fingerprint readers don’t work.

      I have a Dell Dell Pro next to me with a web cam that doesn’t work. Arch, btw.

      I also have a Lenovo T14 where everything does work.

      The point is you have to RESEARCH before you buy. Otherwise, you’re gonna get mad a Linux for not supporting your hardware, instead of being mad at yourself for not researching first.

      Hardware that’s too old is problematic and hardware that’s too new can be problematic.

        • Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No, the point is not to nuke it. One point is to have control over your own hardware and (in principle) be able to make sure the software/OS is not using your devices to spy on you.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There’s still tons of devices where Linux doesn’t work properly with them.

      My Intel wireless cards cannot maintain a 6ghz wireless connection for shit despite some of them being over 5 years old. And Intel. Latest stuff, older kernels, none work well. Oddly whatever version of Fedora I had worked the best. My wifi wasn’t unusable when 6ghz was an option. It only dropped to 5/2.4ghz once a minute instead of every 5-20 seconds.

      • funkajunk 🇨🇦@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        For me any Wi-Fi drops were solved by disabling power saving in NetworkManager

        Create a conf file:
        sudo nano /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/wifi-powersave.conf

        Add this into the config file:

        [connection]
        wifi.powersave = 2
        

        Then restart NetworkManager or reboot your system

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        My guess is that you are noticing the difference between new and old kernels

          • CubitOom@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            If the old (or LTS) version of the kernel doesn’t support something newer, and the new version of the kernel does, that would not be a regression.

            I learned this when Skylake first came out. Ubuntu LTS didn’t work on it because it was an old kernel and this was new hardware. If you have new hardware, use a new kernel.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    My bootloader has survived just fine despite being dual boot for the past 2 years. It may have something to do with me only having booted windows once in all that time (to fix a borked NTFS drive) 😁

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      That certainly helps.

      In my case the solution is two EFI partitions.

      Windows finds the first and doesn’t bother looking for a second one, which happens to contain grub and my efistubs.

      Windows will go ahead and clear the UEFI menu sometimes, but manually booting an efi file and then re-adding the grub and stub boot entries is small compared to having my stuff actually deleted.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Dual booting us viable, if you’re curious its good to try linux via dual boot. Windows doesnt break the linux bootloader. The incident referencing was a bug I believe. I know plenty of people who’ve been dual booting for 2+ years keeping both OSs up to date with no issue.

    • KillDash9@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I believe dual boot is more feasible when you have more than one drive, so you don’t risk corrupting it. Another option to test a Linux distribution would be using virtual machines

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That wasn’t “an incident.” The notion of Windows breaking Linux’s bootloader has been a known thing for at least a decade.

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I have had Windows update completely obliterate my Linux partitions at least twice.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Do you remember if its happened in the past 2 years? A patch windows put out in 2024 is supposed to fix this.

        • AmyAye@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          No, I jist run straight Linux (Laptop) or straight Windows (Desktop) now. I don’t have a need to dual boot anymore.

          If I didn’t play Fortnite so much I wouldn’t run Windows at all honestly.

    • witness_me@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’ve had windows nuke my bootloader at least thrice. Stopped dual booting a few years ago so I’m free of that nonsense.

    • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I have had it break my bootloader when I was dual booting, if it wasn’t my main pc then I might risk it but I’m not rolling the dice on if windows decides to break it again.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Still it’s a really good idea to keep a rescue USB drive handy, for when windows decides to update it’s boot loader and blitzes your setup

  • bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    2 separate bootloader partitions. Grub launches the windows bootloader on a different partition so it isn’t aware of anything other than itself. Then the 2nd bootloader actually launches windows. Don’t try to share one partition or else windows will inevitably wind up clobbering the Linux loader.

    • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This assumes windows is not maliciously checking for other bootloaders in order to fuck with them, which I’m not willing to give MS the benefit of the doubt on tbh.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It does work.

        If you have two EFI partitions, Windows will stop looking once it finds the first one.

        Which is actually a problem sometimes, as it will stop looking and use the first one it finds, even if it’s on different drive than windows.

        Imagine installing windows on a machine with two drives. Drive A already has an OS and an EFI partition, so you install Windows to drive B.

        Except Windows will still go ahead and drop the bootloader onto drive A. Potentially breaking the OS that’s there, plus setting up Windows in such a way that it requires drive A to boot. EVEN THOUGH THAT ISN’T WHERE YOU INSTALLED IT.

        This is why guides tell you to install windows with only one drive connected. It’s the only way to ensure it puts the bootloader and OS on the same drive.

        • Klajan@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I have found that removing the EFI flag from the partition also works. I just choose which is easier, since removing some nvme SSDs can be buried under a few components depending on the motherboard

    • jason@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is the way. I just discovered this, but the lazy way. If I want windows, I mash f8 on startup to get the manual boot selection. I never start windows through grub (systemd-boot in my case). It has its own EFI partition.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Then Windows will fuck up the EFI entry itself. Easy to fix of course but a pain in the ass when you are just starting with Linux and have barely any idea other than reinstalling for the 10th time in a few weeks.

    • senseamidmadness@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Grub refers to this as chainloading and I did it years ago successfully (though with windows 10). Everything has to be EFI boot so grub can see the windows bootloader.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Kirk : I use a computer with an AI assistant and 1 gb of free ram. How about you?

      Homer : I have a normal computer that lets me do what I want with my hardware.

  • NM_Gringo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The reason I just overwrote the Windows partition, instead of futzing with fixing dual boot was GDID. MSFTs global ID that tracks, literally, everything you do.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If you bought a store laptop, I’d bet those configuration signatures were recorded when it got imaged… for the police of course.

  • rndm@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I love Linux, but damn unless you use Amd video cards. It’s a hard sell, especially if you’re a gamer. Not to mention, how often games break because they’re designed for windows. So dual boot is reasonable, in my opinion.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Why? I have an nvidia card and haven’t noticed any major issues. It hasn’t even bricked the system on a driver update in years now.

      • rndm@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I wasn’t talking about bricked systems, just the games themselves have issues and glitches. Especially with Nvidia. Not all games mind you. Plus the performance tax on Nvidia with Linux.

        • Johanno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          When running the games through Proton I never had issues because of Nvidia.

          I have issues because of Nvidia, but none are related to gaming.

          If you have the newest propertary drivers it should work just fine.

    • vanillama@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It used to be much, much worse. While some people still struggle a little with Nvidia on Linux, it seems perfectly usable in most distros and games by now.

      • rndm@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        I agree it has improved, but I still have enough issues to where for me anyways. To justify dual boot, that is until I get an AMD video card. Believe me if I didint have to constantly find Nvidia workarounds, for performance and bugs. I would be on Linux 100 percent of the time.

  • DarkSirrush@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If you are on a desktop, there is always the option of throwing a GT 1030 in the secondary pcie slot and jumping through the 100 hoops to get Looking Glass set up.

    Windows can’t fuck the bootloader if you lie about its HDD access.

    • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Or just use QEMU/KVM wirh VirtIO extensions if you don’t need hardware rendering on Windows. Problem is most dual-booters I know use Windows to play games with kernel anti-cheat. Not much you can do to virtualize that

      • vividspecter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The newer GPU virtio stuff is all happening in Linux guests right now, but that is of course also not useful for the Windows gaming use case.

      • DarkSirrush@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, I can’t think of anything I need windows for that doesn’t also need a real GPU to be useful.

        And even then its only really 1 game, setting up looking glass was as much for tinkering amusement than actual use.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Linux isn’t there yet.

    How do I know? because I JUST tried to move over to linux.

    First I tried Zorin OS, and TBH it pretty much worked right out of the box.

    BUT!

    My monitor would only go up to 120hz Refresh rate, even though it can do 144hz natively. And games that are supposed to work on Linux (Arma 3) did not work no matter what I did. And forget about VR.

    So I tried Arch.

    And Jesus Christ…

    Zorin was as easy to install as windows.

    ARCH is actively trying to stop you from installing it.

    So I did what most people do and youtube’d how to install Arch and oh my god, I encountered the living embodiment of the “Linux user meme” so hard when I did that.

    But I finally was sort of able to get it up and running. Of course there are no list of packages that you will need for the smooth operating of Arch. Like I dunno, how about a file manager?

    So I said fuck it and was going to try to install steamOS. but I fucked up formatting the drives and USB drive.

    Fortunately, I had an old windows installer kicking around and finally able to get windows re-installed.

    So my opinion for now is simply “Not ready for prime time… yet.”

    But when it does maybe I will give it another try.

      • rbn@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And my impression is that they currently rather make things worse rather than better.

      • Alpha71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        ^^^This is the other “Linux user meme” More than happy to tear someone down and not offer help.

      • Alpha71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If I do go back it, will be back to Zorin. very simple installation, and everything worked. For example, on Zorin, my bluetooth would connect to my headphones just fine. On Arch, they saw my headphones, but refused to connect. I tried a few fixes I found online but just gave up and went wired.

        • smoker@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          It’s not like Zorin is easy to install because the devs made their own simple installer. Almost every modern linux distribution ships with one of two or three prebuilt installer tools, with very few exceptions (one being arch, though if I recall correctly even arch has an option to use an installer)

          You will most likely have the same or a very similar experience installing mint or bazzite or endevour or whatever else you choose.

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      On the other hand, I set up a dual boot with 1 of my 4 ssds being available to both OS just in case. That was 8 or so months ago, and I haven’t booted into Windows 10 once since then.

      My 165hz monitors are fine at 165, and that was without any config (NobaraOS). All the games I actively play work fine, and the closest thing to an issue is have is my H.O.T.A.S. registering only 12 or so buttons/switches instead of the much larger amount it has, but i haven’t put any effort into figuring it out because I only use it for one game.

      Experiences vary, but I feel like you’re judging a whole platform from choosing a simple Windows replacement then switching to one of the harder OS’s to setup.

      There’s plenty designed more for gaming which seems to be your monitor setup.

    • mursejoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ve used Ubuntu for years and it’s easy to install and widely supports all the things I need. Bazzite is also a great option. I’ve never been interested in Arch and SteamOS just came out for desktop so I’d rather not be an early adopter when Bazzite is already ironed out and waiting to be installed.

      Love steamOS on my deck, but see no use for it on my Desktop atm.

      Windows 11 is actually spyware garbage and I won’t have it in my house.

      • Alpha71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’ll probably get around to dual booting Zorin. except I’ll be using Linux for productivity and windows for gaming.

        • mursejoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I don’t see a reason to use Windows for gaming if you don’t play games with anticheat. I have a 9070XT so it just works with Linux. Left Nvidia and Linux is much happier.

          • Alpha71@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I have a 7900XTX and don’t like the fact that there is no software support. Only drivers. Plus you get worse framerates than on windows.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          dual booting just makes things more difficult. windows likes to silently change things in the bios and on disk drives it manages, basically pulling the rug out from under linux. you can mitigate it by making linux aware of the fact but that’s not the default behaviour, because again dual booting isn’t really recommended.

    • Caves_of_steel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Havent tried out zorinOS but so far i never hat problems running games under Linux : steam + proton experimental just makes it as easy AS downloading via steam and hitting the play button - literally die nothing else (have used Linux mint first now Debian - Debian required a bit oft fiddeling for steam but not with individual games)

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        arma is an annoying one because it’s a bespoke engine with a lot of deep windows integration, coming from the fact that parts of it is from 1995. add online multiplayer anticheat to that and it gets even more difficult.

        that said, i got it running on linux in like… 2019, so i would have thought it to be easier now.

    • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m sorry your delightful parody of failed install went over their heads, please continue posting your eccentric new-to-linux word art

  • Artwork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Wonderful day!

    It’s apparently the third day (in a week!) I see people share their negative view on the booting being damaged by Windows…
    Frankly, it’s quite odd to see so many people having the issue when Windows or any other OS rewrites the bootloader…
    It’s sure possible to have it safe, so that even Windows won’t rewrite during its update.

    Though, I’ve been into Linux for more than 20 years now, I do have a machine that has Windows 10 installed alongside Linux, even if it’s more frequent to boot Windows in a virtual machine nowadays.

    The idea is to not share the location for the EFI files (in UEFI mode), but let the systems have their own keeping them fairly isolated, where Grub v2+ or another bootloader you prefer, load them all respectively, being located on a safer partition.

    For example:

    1. We have two storages (e.g., SSD): /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.

    2. Install Windows on /dev/sdb (so it creates its own ESP);

    3. Install Linux on /dev/sda (so it creates its own ESP), with a normal/manual partitioning:
      - /boot/ (for Kernels I have 4 GiB+);
      - /boot/efi/ (commonly, from 128 to 512 MiB is enough);
      - Here I normally also have a swap partition, and separate: /home/, /var/;
      - Select Grub to be installed on the /dev/sda;

    4. Boot the Grub in /dev/sda;

    5. Update Grub within Linux, so it finds the Windows EFI on another drive via its os-prober.

    Here, I believe efibootmgr should show the existing EFI, or you could check it manually in /boot/efi after.

    Windows should operate on its own ESP it created on its own storage, and don’t overwrite the Grub.

    At voila!


    To additionally clarify, in my personal experience for many years on Linux, I usually tend to see (and are fond of, personally) having separate mounts for contextually different data, where one of the most adequate in frequent circles and duties is to separate the responsibility as, for example:

    1. Main system (root) - /;
    2. Kernel (~4GiB) - /boot/;
    3. EFI (~128-512MiB) - /boot/efi/;
    4. User personal - /home/;
    5. Variable - /var/;
    6. Swap;
    7. (Optional) System configuration - /etc/;
    8. (Optional) Temporary - /tmp/;

    It’s also frequent to see the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) active, that may support a more fluent organization of hardware and logical devices. In this case, we might have all the above mounts, except 2 and 3, practically encrypted, too.

    One of my current main machines have the following partitions (though no dual-boot on it):

    sda                                             8:16   0 953.9G  0 disk
    ├─sda1                                          8:17   0   512M  0 part  /boot/efi
    ├─sda2                                          8:18   0     4G  0 part  /boot
    ├─sda3                                          8:19   0    32G  0 part  [SWAP]
    └─sda4                                          8:20   0 917.4G  0 part
      └─luks-12341234-1234-1234-1234-123412341234 252:0    0 917.4G  0 crypt
        ├─vg_system-lv_var                        252:1    0   400G  0 lvm   /var
        ├─vg_system-lv_home                       252:2    0   400G  0 lvm   /home
        └─vg_system-lv_root                       252:3    0 117.4G  0 lvm   /
    

    If interested, please check the following:
    - file-hierarchy (File system hierarchy overview… - Linux manual page…)
    - Encrypting an entire system;


    On Windows, if I am not mistaken (please correct me if wrong), the most frequent is to have at least two explicit partitions, in addition to the implicit primary 4 ones:

    1. EFI Boot Partition we mentioned above;
    2. Recovery Partition;
    3. Microsoft Reserved;
    4. Primary Windows.

    For example:

    - C:\ - System and automatically organized User personal files (desktop, documents, variable as AppData/ProgramData);
    - D:\ - Manually installed programs and manually organized User personal files;

    You can include a separate data partition to enable easier maintenance for situations where either the primary operating system is likely to be replaced, or when multiple operating systems exist on the same device, such as Windows 10 and Windows 7. When a device has multiple hard drives, a data partition may be stored on another drive.

    For typical single-drive configurations, it’s best that you not use a separate data partition. There are two main reasons:

    - The partition may not automatically protect data that is stored outside the user profile folders. For example, a guest user might have access to files in an unprotected data partition.
    - If you change the default location of the user profile folders to any volume other than the system volume, you cannot service your image, and the computer may not apply updates or fixes to the installation.

    Source (Hard drives and partitions - Windows Documentation…)


    Oh! I would recommend KDE Partition Manger if you prefer GUI for partitioning.

    It’s likely worth to mention that KDE Partition Manger (project source) is likely one of the best out there I found (tried at least 11 a few years ago) for convenient GUI Luks2 and LVM support, if required.

    Even if compared to some of the popular, where Gnome’s, GParted, and QtParted resulted in either unsupported logic for Luks2 and LVM or did not complete the task successfully. These tools are still awesome for other tasks, I believe!

    Though, perhaps likely as you I do prefer shell or TUI, being dived mostly in terminals/servers, and a script is always an option, of course. Not to mention that even with the GUI above, manual commands are normally eminent/imminent.

    Related: https://wiki.t2linux.org/guides/windows#separate-the-efi-partition-after-linux-is-installed

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      For example:

      We have two storages (e.g., SSD): /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.
      
      Install Windows on /dev/sdb (so it creates its own ESP);
      
      Install Linux on /dev/sda (so it creates its own ESP), with a normal/manual partitioning:
      - /boot/ (for Kernels I have 4 GiB+);
      - /boot/efi/ (commonly, from 128 to 512 MiB is enough);
      - Here I normally also have a swap partition, and separate: /home/, /var/;
      - Select Grub to be installed on the /dev/sda;
      
      Boot the Grub in /dev/sda;
      
      Update Grub within Linux, so it finds the Windows EFI on another drive via its os-prober.
      

      Here, I believe efibootmgr should show the existing EFI, or you could check it manually in /boot/efi after.

      Windows should operate on its own ESP it created on its own storage, and don’t overwrite the Grub.

      At voila!

      Then Windows will fuck up your EFI entries. Which is not a big deal if you know what you are doing but a completely different story for the audience you are explicitly addressing here when you even explain how to check those entries in the first place.

      Also you did not actually mention that fastboot needs to be disabled in Windows, thus a clueless person will not understand the random hardware errors on Linux caused by not properly initialized devices and will blame Linux.

      (And let’s not even talk about some of the really insane stuff like pre-installed Microsoft SecureBoot keys that brick you whole system when removed because idiotic OEMs signed their own hardware’s EFI drivers with the keys already pre-installed just because they can…)

      So no, it’s not “quite odd to see so many people having the issue when Windows”. That’s what Windows is causing, often intentionally so. Is most of this easily fixable? Sure… But it’s a very effective deterrent for many people, so they never reach the point where they understand and be able to fix that stuff.

      • Artwork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Windows never touched the main EFI entry in my cases, even at updating it from 10 to 11, and I clarified it 3 times.

        With a few Google queries we may find it mentioned, yet I’ve just found a weak one at this moment:

        If you are booting with Windows, you should simply be aware of the problem, because you can easily overcome it by temporarily changing the type code of the non-Windows ESP(s) if you run into problems. Note that Windows will boot just fine on a disk with multiple ESPs; it’s just the installer that chokes on such disks.

        Source

        Some documentations found mentioned relatively similar:

        The only Microsoft supported workaround for booting multiple installations of Windows in a uEFI environment is to use a dual boot configuration. This will make use of a single ESP and one MSR while still allowing the user to choose to boot to an installation on disk 1 or disk 2.

        Source

        • Ooops@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Note that Windows will boot just fine on a disk with multiple ESPs

          Nice for Windows to support this theoretically but the UEFI standard does not require support for multiple ESPs on a disk, so you will easily find hardware that in fact will simply discover the first ESP then stop. Because actual implementations matter and a lot of them are bad.

          Speaking of bad implementations. We got several manufacturers a few years ago where their UEFI implementation broke and bricked the whole device after editing the EFI entries via efibootmgr exactly as defined by standard. Oh, you wanted to install Linux? Your device is now done because no one ever tested them without anything but the Windows pre-installs.

          Yet two other cases of totally coincidental “This should work but doesn’t, must be a Linux issue” artificially created by Microsoft (who after all were one of the driving forces behind UEFI development, also the reason we are still stuck with FAT32 ESPs - the only file system ESPs are required to support by the standard with everything else optional).

          Windows never touched the main EFI entry in my cases

          In the end positive anecdotal experiences don’t matter much. If a relevant fraction of users has issues that should not exist when installing Linux (and that obviously don’t exist with Windows because here OEMs actually do proper testing here… or it’s Windows/Microsoft itself causing the issues (pre-installed key, fast boot shenanigans, hardware that should be supported but randomly isn’t etc.)) that’s helping to prevent a lot of people from trying it in the first place. And that’s by design.

          • Artwork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 minutes ago

            Thank you, heartfelt, for a more experienced, informative, and great response, with more details to learn from!

  • SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I think that’s why peeps install stuff like gnu/linux and then slap Nvidia & Steam on them for lolz, they often can’t live without pretending they are a wizard or a soldier in some novel machine generated propitiatary hallucinations from an app store no matter the cost, Gabe needs better yachts.