You completely debunk the idea that “I don’t think the growth in “unknown” is the primary factor of Window’s decline in market share.” in the same comment you said it? Because what you said makes absolutely no sense in the face of the actual numbers.
I expound on the two points because you can’t just rest your argument on them and then limply, vaguely disclaim that it’s terrible methodology.
You completely debunk the idea that “I don’t think the growth in “unknown” is the primary factor of Window’s decline in market share.” in the same comment you said it? Because what you said makes absolutely no sense in the face of the actual numbers.
I expound on the two points because you can’t just rest your argument on them and then limply, vaguely disclaim that it’s terrible methodology.
Bruh people on Lemmy say the most mind-numbing things
Thank you for demonstrating.