• SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yup. But it is not a horrid starting point. There is always a better everything.

    Just because one finds fault does not mean that one can not also find use.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The point of that saying is once you find bad apples it’s too late for the bunch. You have to throw them all out.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Problem is there are better ways, more specific ways.

          Frankly, in my life experience people with cognitive disabilities don’t need a specific numerical grade, a broader categorization is good. So the IQ metric just doesn’t tell us enough (no indication of specifically how the impairment would be, nor indication about potential other developmental issues that may require accommodation).

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t see the actual utility in IQ outside of very fringe use-cases. It’s over-utilized despite being a poor metric itself.