• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I would guess it’s because it’s likely very low cost and easy to build, but there are obvious environmental savings that fall out of it naturally.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      savings that fall out of it naturally.

      sigh… Buh dim tish.

      On the topic, I really doubt it’s about savings at this scale, which is very much proof of concept. I mean it could be but at this stage it’s more important to show it’s potential. And for some thing that’s gonna run for thousands of cycles…