qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 days agoborrow checker?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1394arrow-down15
arrow-up1389arrow-down1imageborrow checker?lemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 days agoEven if the pay is good - unfucking vibed code is going to be very grueling. Like fixing legacy code but so much worse - because legacy code at least used to make sense at some point in the past.
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day ago legacy code at least used to make sense at some point in the past. That assumption doesn’t hold where I work.
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoDid you go back with a time machine to make sure it didn’t make sense back when it was written?
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 day agoI know my colleagues and former colleagues, and have reason to be confident it didn’t.
Even if the pay is good - unfucking vibed code is going to be very grueling. Like fixing legacy code but so much worse - because legacy code at least used to make sense at some point in the past.
That assumption doesn’t hold where I work.
Did you go back with a time machine to make sure it didn’t make sense back when it was written?
I know my colleagues and former colleagues, and have reason to be confident it didn’t.