When i use all of my internet limit it limits my internet, on firefox websites are unusable. Is there browser for android with following features:

Preferably on F-Droid

Just load text

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Had to get on our developers as our main website was over 50MB on load. They hadn’t optimized any images and were using size tags to resize a 4K image down to a thumbnail.

    • Azzu@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah the problem is not the browser, it’s that websites are so big. Firefox works perfectly fine on low bandwidth if you use ublock origin and block media and script loading.

      I use this often for the same reason, many websites don’t display properly or at all anymore but at least it’s more usable.

    • mecen@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Thanks, I used it with adnauseum and it made internet slightly more bearable.

      But I reduced max loading element size to 10KiB

      Does anyone know how to make it load later these elements

      For example load first elements with 1kb later 10 kb next 100kb etc.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Lynx or w3m or something in Termux? (Installing Termux would be best somewhere you can get faster internet, like a library or business, etc)

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes, I just tried it. In Termux you would have the on-screen keyboard up nearly all the time anyway but both browsers I mentioned allow tapping on links, etc. (But w3m seems to require pressing Enter on the keyboard to confirm navigating to them)

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Lynx still lives? 👀

      Edit: Why downvotes? I’m pleasantly surprised that decades old text browser is still with us 🤷 Sorry about that.

  • MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I would think that whatever browser you use would, presumably, make little difference to how much data a website tries to send you? It would only change what’s displayed. (But happy to be corrected on that by someone more knowledgeable.)

    If your connection really is limited to such a slow speed, you might need to find a proxy server that strips out as much as possible before it reaches you.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      The rendering speed difference is negligible, with a bandwidth this limited the only strategy is to limit what the browser fetches. You don’t need a proxy server to strip out page content (also because that would imply breaking the encryption stream), a browser could simply choose not to fetch any image or multimedia resources, override remote fonts with local ones, etc. In that sense the choice matters, because some are specialized for this purpose or can be configured to act in these manners

    • L7HM77@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I needed something like this back when I lived out in the sticks. Could only get 2g - 3g on Verizon at home, had a DSL line for the desktop, high speed connections were prohibitively expensive. Back in the day you could just walk away and let sites buffer while doing other stuff, but as the rest of the world grew faster, low speed customers got left behind. Everything is set to timeout if it fails to load in a couple minutes.

      Only solution I ever found was to disable JavaScript, force everything to HTML/CSS only where possible, and use a download manager with automatic retry/restart to download any videos I wanted to watch from YouTube or Facebook.

    • mecen@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Is there ways to do it on firefox, i remember opera had this gimmick.

    • Björn@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well, the browser could choose not to download the images, videos and styling information. Trouble is that many modern sites load their content through JavaScript programs that can be comparatively massive.

      But I guess losing those sites would be a small price to pay for OP.

      Just loading the text should be really small, especially when it is compressed, which should be the standard nowadays.

  • Ftumch@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Try the uMatrix plugin. It allows you to dis- or enable things like scripts and images on a per-site basis.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Is there an internet for this sort of thing?

    Reducing data usage in general would be nice but too many websites just openly disrespect their users by using far too much bandwidth.

  • amzd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You can kind of use delta chat with a preview bot. Delta Chat works extremely well on low bandwidth so even if it takes a long time, you’ll eventually get the website, unlike in browsers in my experience