• marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence

    Bartz v. Anthropic

    Kadrey v. Meta

    UMG v Udio

    Those are the settled ones so far. This is 4 years into AI existing. Lawsuits, especially copyright lawsuits, tend to take up to a decade in the US, because the US legal system is shit.

    Here’s 118 currently in progress. Because AI is copyright infringement.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence

      In February 2025, the court granted summary judgment that such copying was not fair use, emphasizing that the purpose of ROSS’s copying was to build a directly competing product

      Bartz v. Anthropic

      The court granted summary judgment for Anthropic that training LLMs on copyrighted materials is fair use.

      Kadrey v. Meta

      Judge Vince Chhabria denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on fair use and granted Meta’s cross-motion and granted Meta’s motion for partial summary judgment on the DMCA claim.

      UMG v Udio

      Settled - no judgement.

      Those are the settled ones so far. This is 4 years into AI existing. Lawsuits, especially copyright lawsuits, tend to take up to a decade in the US, because the US legal system is shit.

      Here’s 118 currently in progress. Because AI is copyright infringement.

      Having lawsuits is not winning lawsuits. The AI companies have been winning on fair use. Same as Google back in the 2000s when they were sued for for various search products (news, books, etc.).