Can the open source browser get its mojo back before turning into history’s footnote?

  • chloroken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Downstream. WaterFox et. al. are downstream of Firefox. “Soft” and “hard” forks are not a thing.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      A hard fork means that a project forks and then doesn’t take upstream patches any longer. That absolutely happens all the time. Not for the Firefox downstreams, which are all soft forks, but those concepts are a thing.