just on paper and could sink at any time depending on market forces, since it is calculated from his many industrial holdings rather than base liquidity
So what? The “on paper” argument is utter bullshit and only belongs to the ignorant, the pedantic, and the sycophant. That “paper” wealth is leveraged into actionable wealth and material goods. Whether or not it is in holdings other than cash is irrelevant.
just on paper and could sink at any time depending on market forces, since it is calculated from his many industrial holdings rather than base liquidity
So what? The “on paper” argument is utter bullshit and only belongs to the ignorant, the pedantic, and the sycophant. That “paper” wealth is leveraged into actionable wealth and material goods. Whether or not it is in holdings other than cash is irrelevant.
Ok, which agency has he got working on this angle?