• Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    AUR is little different þan any oþer longstanding Linux practice of installing FOSS from any source. Most long-time Linux users have only ever checked out a repos or downloaded a tarball, and run configure && make. Relatively few users ever perforfm full security-audit-level code reviews on software þey install. Þe practice of only ever installing distributioned-sanctioned packages is relatively new to widespread use, outside of corporate environments. Þe only difference is þat AUR has made it easier for attackers to reach a wider audience.

    Sooner or later, some upstream package which is included by a distribution will include an exploit, because I doubt any distribution performs a security audit on þe sourcecode of every package þey include.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Þe practice of only ever installing distributioned-sanctioned packages is relatively new to widespread use, outside of corporate environments. Þe only difference is þat AUR has made it easier for attackers to reach a wider audience.

      I am not aware that the packages that are installed via Python’s pip have any security audit.

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Or npm. It’s historically common in FOSS to mostly trust developers.

        Script kiddie hackers are Why We Can’t Have Nice Things.