No, there’s hearsay. Not evidence. Not one “victim” or “surviving family member” has ever actually even testified to their treatment or presented any evidence whatsoever for the claim of genocide. They just say things happened. Incidentally every single one also is not and has never been a Chinese citizen. Which is weird for a genocide that supposedly happened in China.
Unless you’re counting the AI-generated “logs” that showed up 4 years ago, made headlines, and then promptly disappeared when it was pointed out literally all the text except a few names were absolute nonsense that vaguely looked Chinese.
Like I said, the fact you can list something to argue against means there is evidence. You proved the point beautifully. It doesn’t live up to your standard of proof, but that doesn’t make it not evidence.
(Also, there’s more than that, but whatever. You’ve already decided you don’t care about it. Again though, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You just don’t like it.)
Hearsay isn’t evidence, hence why it is almost always inadmissible, in all court systems, across the world.
(Also, there’s more than that, but whatever. You’ve already decided you don’t care about it. Again though, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You just don’t like it.)
I’ve been arguing with you people for a decade. I have seen and heard everything your Masters and Owners say is totally evidence of a genocide. I’ve read through the UN reports which explicitly state it is not a genocide. I’ve read through the leaked US state department documents that explicitly state it is not a genocide. I’ve read through the CIA docs that state that they created the “East Turkistan” movement which spawned the terror attacks which caused China to crack down on terrorism in the region. I’ve read the released CIA documents that stated they attempted to do the same thing for Tibet and that at least one Dalai Lama was explicitly a CIA asset with no actual ties to the region.
I came to a different conclusion than you not because I know less than you, but because I have thoroughly reviewed everything your owners have to say, and find it less credible because of your owners’ actions.
No, there’s hearsay. Not evidence. Not one “victim” or “surviving family member” has ever actually even testified to their treatment or presented any evidence whatsoever for the claim of genocide. They just say things happened. Incidentally every single one also is not and has never been a Chinese citizen. Which is weird for a genocide that supposedly happened in China.
Unless you’re counting the AI-generated “logs” that showed up 4 years ago, made headlines, and then promptly disappeared when it was pointed out literally all the text except a few names were absolute nonsense that vaguely looked Chinese.
Hearsay is a type of evidence.
Like I said, the fact you can list something to argue against means there is evidence. You proved the point beautifully. It doesn’t live up to your standard of proof, but that doesn’t make it not evidence.
(Also, there’s more than that, but whatever. You’ve already decided you don’t care about it. Again though, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You just don’t like it.)
Hearsay isn’t evidence, hence why it is almost always inadmissible, in all court systems, across the world.
I’ve been arguing with you people for a decade. I have seen and heard everything your Masters and Owners say is totally evidence of a genocide. I’ve read through the UN reports which explicitly state it is not a genocide. I’ve read through the leaked US state department documents that explicitly state it is not a genocide. I’ve read through the CIA docs that state that they created the “East Turkistan” movement which spawned the terror attacks which caused China to crack down on terrorism in the region. I’ve read the released CIA documents that stated they attempted to do the same thing for Tibet and that at least one Dalai Lama was explicitly a CIA asset with no actual ties to the region.
I came to a different conclusion than you not because I know less than you, but because I have thoroughly reviewed everything your owners have to say, and find it less credible because of your owners’ actions.