Your first link leads to an article with exactly zero substantiating evidence included, no description of anything resembling a methodology or a source for data. What it does include is a direct reference to the National Museum of the Holodomor Genocide, Kyiv, which seems like a pretty obvious indication of where this source’s biases lie. This is what happens when you post the first source you find without bothering to actually read it.
Your second link leads to a posting for a seminar about “authoritarian regimes”. No data, no methodology, no evidence just like the first one. You also refer directly to it as a paper, indicating that you also didn’t actually bother reading your own source. Says “Social Research Seminar” right at the top of the page and says when it’s being held more than once, clearly not a research paper or study.
Your first link leads to an article with exactly zero substantiating evidence included, no description of anything resembling a methodology or a source for data. What it does include is a direct reference to the National Museum of the Holodomor Genocide, Kyiv, which seems like a pretty obvious indication of where this source’s biases lie. This is what happens when you post the first source you find without bothering to actually read it.
Your second link leads to a posting for a seminar about “authoritarian regimes”. No data, no methodology, no evidence just like the first one. You also refer directly to it as a paper, indicating that you also didn’t actually bother reading your own source. Says “Social Research Seminar” right at the top of the page and says when it’s being held more than once, clearly not a research paper or study.
You should be embarassed and silent.
/disengage