Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agophotoshop's trademark rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up174arrow-down1imagephotoshop's trademark rulelemmy.mlArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square18fedilinkfile-text
minus-square☭SaltyIcetea☭@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up29·2 months agocounterpoint, language evolves over time and if the majority of people decide that these are proper words then so be it
minus-squareSuccessful_Try543@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up21·2 months agoThis image was photoshopped with GIMP.
minus-squareRobotFK@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months ago*This image was photoshopped by a GIMP
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoThis why trademarks are not nouns.
minus-squareSoup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoThis is literally about whether the word can be trademarked, not about whether it’s a real word or not. You should not speak on language until you have a basic grasp on how to even read one.
minus-squarewarbond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 months agoI thought it was about how Adobe should fuck off
counterpoint, language evolves over time and if the majority of people decide that these are proper words then so be it
This image was photoshopped with GIMP.
*This image was photoshopped by a GIMP
This why trademarks are not nouns.
This is literally about whether the word can be trademarked, not about whether it’s a real word or not. You should not speak on language until you have a basic grasp on how to even read one.
I thought it was about how Adobe should fuck off
Adobe rep, is that you?