• minfapper@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Maybe if they took security even remotely seriously and made a functioning sandbox (that apps can’t trivially opt themselves out of), we wouldn’t have to care whether an app was AI generated or not.

    Yes, containers/sandboxes have vulnerabilities that really clever attackers can exploit, but AI generated slop can’t.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      took security even remotely seriously

      There’s a reason they’re at SLSA1 . And this is it.

      Plot twist: SLSA4 has been achievable since like 1998. Sit DOWN, Debian.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, containers/sandboxes have vulnerabilities that really clever attackers can exploit, but AI generated slop can’t.

      Wait are you suggesting that AI slop code can’t have vulnerabilities? Cause… that’s hilariously not even remotely true. It’s a huge issue in SecOps, it was even an issue in the past when humans didn’t have a “easy” button and every vibe coder dumped commits. It’s way worse now because a lot of the vibe coded shit isn’t checked, and the people who produce it have no clue what the fuck it does in the first place.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Plenty of other issues or security vulnerabilities can exist that a good sandbox won’t catch. Like software can insecurely store and transmit passwords, have bad randomness for something security sensitive, secretly be mining crypto behind the scenes and burn through battery/electricity, etc.