There are two types of carbon capture. One is at the source, as is happening here, which is actually effective. The other is trying to scrub carbon from the atmosphere where the math does not work. If carbon capture starts producing useful outputs then there is a direct economic incentive to start doing it at the source. Incidentally, there are other similar processes that are also very promising https://www.foodtimes.eu/food-system/co2-upcycling-feed-protein-china/
I suspect they know it doesn’t work, but people line their pockets and then sell it to the gullible public as doing something about the climate crisis.
There are two types of carbon capture. One is at the source, as is happening here, which is actually effective. The other is trying to scrub carbon from the atmosphere where the math does not work. If carbon capture starts producing useful outputs then there is a direct economic incentive to start doing it at the source. Incidentally, there are other similar processes that are also very promising https://www.foodtimes.eu/food-system/co2-upcycling-feed-protein-china/
Wasn’t the atmospheric scrubbing just used at oil fields to inject into old wells to extract the last bits of oil out of the ground?
There have been greenwash projects as well. The numbers are hilarious, like they remove 50 tons a year. 🤣
https://www.deepskyclimate.com/blog/canadas-deep-sky-to-pilot-dac-unit-from-dutch-startup-carbyon
Yeah, I know the fact that politicians actually fell for that shit is insane.
I suspect they know it doesn’t work, but people line their pockets and then sell it to the gullible public as doing something about the climate crisis.
Idk loads of politicians are kinda fucking dumb…
there is that too, but greed and corruptions are big factors to be sure