I don’t know where are we on ethnic cleansing when the current Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine keeps a notebook of subraces. I guess we’ll never know what this could possibly mean.
Never seen someones argument fall apart so hard after manouvering themselves into a corner.
The wall of links, nothingburgers, the president who apparently said everything out loud taken completely out of context and then the dramatic notebook. A mistranslation that lead you into believing something to be true just because you wish for it to be so.
I mean you could, at any point, proof your points. Like simply spelling out the word on the notebook. Just write it down. Come on, it is so easy.
Or if that is too much, how about linking that other UN case that must exist where Ukraine did not win the case.
So many opportunities, none taken. You can also simply accept that you have been lied to by others which lead to you believing a lie. It is okay to make mistakes.
I mean he did not say what you claim as I have already told you. Simply repeating it does not make it true.
Also I have no clue what you try to tell me with that article.
So where are we on ethnic cleansing? Still nowhere it seems.
I don’t know where are we on ethnic cleansing when the current Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine keeps a notebook of subraces. I guess we’ll never know what this could possibly mean.
What did you use to translate that page?
підарас translates to faggot/asshole/bastart.
So it is a list of bastards and has nothing to do with sub-races.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/підарас
Try google translate, but even with this translation it’s very obviously not bastard.
I mean you could have simply conseded the point instead of hammering down on your mistake.
Look at the notebook and show me the word that translates to what you claim it does.
I already did, you’re not fooling anybody here.
Never seen someones argument fall apart so hard after manouvering themselves into a corner.
The wall of links, nothingburgers, the president who apparently said everything out loud taken completely out of context and then the dramatic notebook. A mistranslation that lead you into believing something to be true just because you wish for it to be so.
I love how you just keep repeating this in face of all evidence provided. You’re like baby Goebbels.
I mean you could, at any point, proof your points. Like simply spelling out the word on the notebook. Just write it down. Come on, it is so easy.
Or if that is too much, how about linking that other UN case that must exist where Ukraine did not win the case.
So many opportunities, none taken. You can also simply accept that you have been lied to by others which lead to you believing a lie. It is okay to make mistakes.