• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Hmm, depending on whose opinion you listen to, education systems have always been built around workforce productivity:

    RSA ANIMATE: Changing Education Paradigms

    “… the current system was structured for a different age. It was conceived in the intellectual culture of the enlightenment, and in the economic circumstances of the industrial revolution
    […]
    it was driven by an economic imperative of the time
    […]
    we have a system of education that is modeled on the interests of industrialism, and in the image of it.”

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You can argue that primary and secondary school was about workforce productivity, but college was designed for leadership training.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Well… the first colleges were established to train clergy, because reading and writing were rare skills at the time, and there was a demand for trained clergy who worked as clerks, accountants and record keepers for nobles who could not themselves read or write, which I think just circles back to the workforce productivity thing.

        This is also true for Confucian schools in China. The students were not clergy in the religious sense, but they learned reading, writing and tradition in order to become useful administrators for local rulers.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Colleges haven’t been training people how to read for centuries; it has been assumed that people entering college could read and write with a pen for a long time and college shifted with it.

          And the collegiate system wasn’t based on Confucian teaching styles.