• merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And that they’ve observed that once groups reach a certain size, it’s inevitable that the group contains at least one asshole.

      It’s like the fable of the scorpion and the frog. It doesn’t mean that it’s impossible to cross the river. It just means that you need a more complex plan than just carrying the scorpion across on your back.

    • Dialectical Idealist@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      If you only saw a bear in a circus, you would think its nature was to ride a unicycle.

      It’s also intellectually dishonest to ignore examples of communal behavior, such as gift economies and communal farrming, as somehow not counting when we’re considering “human nature”. There are exceedingly many examples of selflessness even in this individualist hellhole we built for ourselves.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Not quite, if that were the case the statement would be “because assholes”. By blaming “human nature” they’re self identifying as one of the assholes.

      Assholism is a diverse group with many discrete types of sub-asshole.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s the nature of humanity that in any reasonably sized group, there are always a few assholes.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It just means they recognize that we are all assholes on the inside. Some of us cognitively try to supress the assholeness. But it’s there. If it wasn’t you would have died of hunger as a baby probably. Cause boy-oh is screaming at 2am an asshole move.