• blackbrook@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair you could call that following the empirical evidence despite it running against theory, which is good science.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, like for example the time spent drawing the worm gives them time to remember to take the absolutely vital step they didn’t do.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          H-h-hey now, nobody said that the worm drawing was ugly!? Nor did people say that the worm was attractive.

          Hrm, someone claiming to be from HR now wants to talk with me (do we even have an HR?)…

          • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Oh, no I meant an ugly worm as opposed to the first one to test if an ugly worm does better or worse. The first one was pretty sexy.