fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 21 hours agoLmaomander.xyzimagemessage-square200fedilinkarrow-up1668arrow-down17
arrow-up1661arrow-down1imageLmaomander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square200fedilink
minus-squarepotatopotato@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·edit-220 hours agoThat’s not how…what??? F = G * (m1 * m2) / r^2 Note that radius is both squared and the dividing term. More distance = less gravity
minus-squarelemmyman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-219 hours agoEscape velocity does scale with (square root of) radius so its not a dumb thought. And I’m not a rocket surgeon but I could imagine earth rockets might be operating near some physical limits that make a 50% increase (or whatever) infeasible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_velocity
minus-squareLojcs@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-218 hours agoWikipedia says energy = GMm/r. if g=GM/r² then energy = mgr, proportional to r given g is constant. apologies My previous comment was wrong, I derivated while integrating.
minus-squareexpr@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 hours agoI stated an assumption and was contributing to the conversation. Even if that assumption is incorrect, there’s no need to be a dick about it. It seems like a larger atmosphere would result in a longer duration exposed to atmospheric drag, thus requiring more fuel to overcome it.
That’s not how…what???
F = G * (m1 * m2) / r^2
Note that radius is both squared and the dividing term. More distance = less gravity
Escape velocity does scale with (square root of) radius so its not a dumb thought.
And I’m not a rocket surgeon but I could imagine earth rockets might be operating near some physical limits that make a 50% increase (or whatever) infeasible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_velocity
Wikipedia says
energy = GMm/r.if
g=GM/r²thenenergy = mgr, proportional to r given g is constant.apologies
My previous comment was wrong, I derivated while integrating.
I stated an assumption and was contributing to the conversation. Even if that assumption is incorrect, there’s no need to be a dick about it.
It seems like a larger atmosphere would result in a longer duration exposed to atmospheric drag, thus requiring more fuel to overcome it.
deleted by creator