not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 days agooptimal amount of syruplemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1513arrow-down116
arrow-up1497arrow-down1imageoptimal amount of syruplemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareCaptDust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up61·edit-25 days agoIf you take the original 16 squares and reduce them each in half, you can have 32 squares. Doctorate now, please.
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·5 days agoIf the squares are half the size, you get 4x the number of squares, assuming you’re measuring side length and not area.
minus-squareCaptDust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·5 days agoOh hey sorry I didn’t know you went to school for this shit. Fine. you make the waffles.
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·5 days agoOne square is the optimal waffle if you’re optimizing for syrup volume alone.
minus-squarecurbstickle@anarchist.nexuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·5 days agoI will put you to work testing this theory. Proceed with waffle preparation and delivery, I’ll be waiting, and will provide my own syrup. Please note all waffles are to be gluten-free, as my body hates me and the things I enjoy.
minus-squaremoody@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 days agoIf you serve the syrup in a cup, then the syrup to waffle ratio is infinite.
minus-squarebumblefumble@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 days agoI post this comment quite often, but a number divided by zero is not infinity, so the syrup to waffle ratio would actually be undefined.
minus-squareTheTetrapod@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·5 days agoFine, as the quantity of waffle approaches zero, the syrup to waffle ratio approaches infinity.
minus-squareKraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoThis tracks because I’m always left with syrup on my plate after finishing the waffle. So I’ve independently verified your hypothesis.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoWhy even have a waffle at all, let’s drink the syrup!
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·5 days agoI should put “Bachelor’s in Waffleology” on my resume
minus-squareMelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoKeep it up and you’ll be the next Waffle King!
minus-squarearcine@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoYou can take this to the limit and make a waffle with infinitely many holes, each infinitely small ! It’s just crepes.
If you take the original 16 squares and reduce them each in half, you can have 32 squares. Doctorate now, please.
If the squares are half the size, you get 4x the number of squares, assuming you’re measuring side length and not area.
Oh hey sorry I didn’t know you went to school for this shit. Fine. you make the waffles.
One square is the optimal waffle if you’re optimizing for syrup volume alone.
I will put you to work testing this theory.
Proceed with waffle preparation and delivery, I’ll be waiting, and will provide my own syrup. Please note all waffles are to be gluten-free, as my body hates me and the things I enjoy.
If you serve the syrup in a cup, then the syrup to waffle ratio is infinite.
I post this comment quite often, but a number divided by zero is not infinity, so the syrup to waffle ratio would actually be undefined.
Fine, as the quantity of waffle approaches zero, the syrup to waffle ratio approaches infinity.
This tracks because I’m always left with syrup on my plate after finishing the waffle. So I’ve independently verified your hypothesis.
Give this man a medal
Why even have a waffle at all, let’s drink the syrup!
I should put “Bachelor’s in Waffleology” on my resume
Dr. Waffleologist!
Keep it up and you’ll be the next Waffle King!
You can take this to the limit and make a waffle with infinitely many holes, each infinitely small !
It’s just crepes.