• searabbit@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s weird because terminally online people forget that profound autism exists but most irl people I talk to have no concept of autism besides profound autism.

    Otoh, I think most people irl and online think of ADHD as quirky distracted ball of energy meanwhile severe ADHD is not actually seen as a disability but a personal failing or mistaken for the classic depression+anxiety combo.

    • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      this is why I still like “autism” as a term referring to severe / profound autism, and using a term still like Aspergers for those with high-functioning / mild autism (and maybe even including “broad autism phenotype”)

    • Bgugi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Absolutely! I think this disconnect is such a big part on why conversations about diagnosis rates, prevention, and treatment break down.

      I honestly believe the dsm5 should have kept Asperger’s as a separate diagnosis than pooling all ASD together.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think that’s a fairly common sentiment. The severity of symptoms is a significant decider in how disordered someone is, and having clean deliniations makes sure that people with less disordered lives are not taking attenion awwy from the needs of those with more disordered lives.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          But they do have clean deliniations. Aspergers is lvl 1 autism. I assume the reason for the change was to increase insurance recognition more than anything. Which is plenty sad on it’s own.