Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

    • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Here’s the thing. The more you use AI to generate your code, the less likely you are to fully review all of it, understand what it’s doing and be able to fix it when bugs or exploits appear, or even know that they exist. So sure, it might work for now but what about in a couple of years of vibe coding it?

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Isnt that just an issue of code reviewing? If your accepting subpar code from AI… you’re probably accepting subpar code from humans…

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Would have been easier if the original dev(s) continued to work on it themselves, instead of sloppifying the code.

        • 18107@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          Technical debt is a very real thing that has been around for a long time and is well documented.

          AI code is not old enough for the technical debt to have really hit hard yet.

        • forrgott@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Except, of course, that this not an imagined or even unlikely outcome; so, no, by definition your link fits not apply.

          Maybe read what you link???

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            ‘It works fine now, but what about after years of this very recent development?’ is absolutely imagined.

            You wanna argue for it? Argue. Don’t posture.

            • forrgott@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              It doesn’t work fine now, though; that’s the whole point. Vibe coding has resulted in numerous public failures, many of them costly. All avoidable.

              The tech debt involved is not some imaginary thing. A bullshit generator on steroids giving you magic coding power is, however, completely imaginary.

              And telling someone else “don’t posture”?!? Then explain YOUR argument! Are you for real?!?

              (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻