What the title says. Well intentioned, often other “neurodivergent” people look at your life, your autism, and say: “you should mask harder.”

For example, I accidentally said something that offended a friend. Won’t go into detail, but it was me unintentionally coming off as arrogant, not something bad like a slur or hate speech.

I asked for advice (elsewhere) and the advice was universally, “you see, NT avoid this topic at all costs. Going forwards, know it is best to avoid this topic.”

But isn’t this just saying “mask harder and be more palatable for everyone else”?

Every piece of “autism advice” I see even in “neurodivergent friendly” communities is basically “how to be less autistic.”

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Don’t call your mother fat, don’t push the person standing at the crosswalk in front of a bus, don’t cut someone’s hair when sitting behind them because it bothers you… Socially unaccepted actions, why, because they are. In another universe they all may be acceptable. Our cultures calls them rude, murder, and possibly assault or maybe just impolite. Why. Because stuff and things. Mostly, it’ll hurt someone’s feelings.

    Really I think it is, our freedom ends where anothers begins. Thus, we are free to do what we wish, but if your happiness impeeds on anothers happiness, then there is an issue.

    Edit*. When the law doesn’t match that, then I feeo government has failed

    • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t think the reasoning behind unspoken customs is unknowable or arbitrary. I think part of being a good person is analyzing the rules that are handed down by our elders and deciding which are good to follow and which are good to leave behind. Circumstances change, new information comes to light that our parents weren’t privy to. Or, maybe they just made convenient or selfish choices when deciding which rules were important. Sometimes those convenient or selfish choices get codified into law, and when they do, it’s up to us to fix them. I dunno if that’s government failing so much as it’s just how government works.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Makes sense, thank you for your response. I am often unsure how to make sure people know that I am being sarcastic or sincere. So thank you for your input. Appreciated

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        New information coming to light is 90% propaganda, 10% truth. If we got rid of all borders and made all insurance companies illegal while saying denying a person care in terms of health would put your organization in prison. It would fix nationalism immediately, drag health costs down, and fix many issues people struggle with. The person who works for their family isn’t an issue, the government that doesn’t let them is. It doesn’t matter where or who they are, they were segregated due to old rules, mainly the British decision to segregate to isolate and isolate and divide to rule. Did wars happen before then, yes. But the way to end all wars isn’t through segregation, but rather assimilation throughly so all are accepted without question.

        Sorry, end rant

        • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          All is well. I also find the problem overwhelming when I try to think about it all at once, all the cruelty we inflict on each other because we were taught to, or because it feels easier to keep rules that afford us the barest of privilege over our neighbors. It’s a lot.