Not sure of their intended reference but:
Cassandra in Illiad esp Trojan Horse incident
Legolas, LotR, and many other Elves in Silmarrilion and Apendices
Various Atreides in Dune (though they can force people to listen, lol)
I had the (mis)fortune of later viewing video of an incident where I “activated.” Atm it seemed to me a very long slow progression (like 10 seconds?) But video-wise it all played out in like a second. The other takeaway was that all the stuff that I saw as “obvious” was greatly exagerated in my perception, so it was obvious to me, but impossible to get neurotypicals to credit (even to want to do) the zoom in and slow motion analysis that would be needed. I found the experience very upsetting/isolating because it proved impossible to get people to understand my perspective.
It’s simple: The OP Trojan horse a Legolas elves while Atreides Dune lol’d an ATM on the slow while the obvious was exaggerated. And it was upsetting impossible perspective.
First, they’re saying that this is a longstanding trope in mythology and literature, the character who can see the future but isn’t believed, like Cassandra. Lord of the Rings isn’t my thing, but I assume they’re giving examples from there as well. Dune is kind of a digression, in that those characters could see the future by recognizing how patterns were going to play out, but there wasn’t any element of not being believed.
Second, they’re talking about being neurodivergent themselves, and having experienced this kind of pattern recognition prediction thing. They’re saying that once someone caught this on video. It’s not clear exactly what they predicted, but apparently, looking at the video, it’s still obvious to them what the cues were that they observed and used to predict whatever it was. I guess the people around them didn’t see it, and were mystified about how they knew to do whatever it was they did in response. They think that the others should be able to look closely at the video of the incident, maybe zoom in and play it at reduced speed, and understand how they recognized what was going to happen, because they could point out all these cues; but they’re frustrated to know that won’t happen. Subjectively they experience the situation as though it lasts much longer than it does in the video, as though time slows down, which they tried to explain by using video game references.
Not sure of their intended reference but: Cassandra in Illiad esp Trojan Horse incident Legolas, LotR, and many other Elves in Silmarrilion and Apendices Various Atreides in Dune (though they can force people to listen, lol) I had the (mis)fortune of later viewing video of an incident where I “activated.” Atm it seemed to me a very long slow progression (like 10 seconds?) But video-wise it all played out in like a second. The other takeaway was that all the stuff that I saw as “obvious” was greatly exagerated in my perception, so it was obvious to me, but impossible to get neurotypicals to credit (even to want to do) the zoom in and slow motion analysis that would be needed. I found the experience very upsetting/isolating because it proved impossible to get people to understand my perspective.
I’m not going to lie- I understood none of this.
OP felt like she was recognizing problems that others failed to acknowledge, often with extreme clarity.
It seemed obvious and urgent to OP, but was difficult to convey to others, leading to OP feeling isolated.
It’s simple: The OP Trojan horse a Legolas elves while Atreides Dune lol’d an ATM on the slow while the obvious was exaggerated. And it was upsetting impossible perspective.
They activated ass to mouth. That’s what I picked up.
I go Prince-of-Persia/MaxPain. It has probably saved me sometimes, but mostly it just results in people thinking I’m a spaz.
…this has not helped my understanding at all lol.
I think their comment has two parts.
First, they’re saying that this is a longstanding trope in mythology and literature, the character who can see the future but isn’t believed, like Cassandra. Lord of the Rings isn’t my thing, but I assume they’re giving examples from there as well. Dune is kind of a digression, in that those characters could see the future by recognizing how patterns were going to play out, but there wasn’t any element of not being believed.
Second, they’re talking about being neurodivergent themselves, and having experienced this kind of pattern recognition prediction thing. They’re saying that once someone caught this on video. It’s not clear exactly what they predicted, but apparently, looking at the video, it’s still obvious to them what the cues were that they observed and used to predict whatever it was. I guess the people around them didn’t see it, and were mystified about how they knew to do whatever it was they did in response. They think that the others should be able to look closely at the video of the incident, maybe zoom in and play it at reduced speed, and understand how they recognized what was going to happen, because they could point out all these cues; but they’re frustrated to know that won’t happen. Subjectively they experience the situation as though it lasts much longer than it does in the video, as though time slows down, which they tried to explain by using video game references.
I love you and your wrinkly brain lol. Thanks
Glad I could help!