My "personal" Lord and Savior.

1dalm@lemmings.world · 2 days ago

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 2 days ago

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 day ago

Okay, but claims presented without evidence can be summarily dismissed without evidence.

Sealioning is badgering people for details after they’ve met the burden of proof. If you haven’t even done that, you’re just trolling.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 22 hours ago

Sealioning is badgering people for details after they’ve met the burden of proof.

I’ve already cited multiple Bible verses.

But these are trivially easy to research on your own.

friend_of_satan@lemmy.world · edit-2 2 days ago

deleted by creator

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 1 day ago

Wasn’t Christopher Hitchens one of the guys who accepted that Iraq had WNDs without any evidence?

I believe he also smoked himself to death, because he wasn’t satisfied with the scientific link between cigarettes and cancer.

friend_of_satan@lemmy.world · 1 day ago

deleted by creator

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 1 day ago

Haha. That’s not even the right fallacy.