• Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Its because we block lemvotes on this server, because people don’t like their votes being exposed. Every server should do this.

          • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            oh, okay. It’s nice that it’s possible to do this.

            Every server should do this.

            I would say that’s for them to decide

            • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              I doubt they’ve asked their users if they want this spying tool to hoover up their votes.

              • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Alright, let me ask you to clear this up for me please. I’m not a developer so I might need some simplification. This Lemvotes thing asks a Lemmy server to give up the users having voted on a particular post. For this to work I would assume the server in question must comply with this request, or store this information in a way that’s accessible in the first place ?

                • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You can read the full context of this here.

                  Votes are transparently federated, but only shown to admins via a few special endpoints, in order to fight one of the biggest spam vectors currently on the fediverse, which is federated downvote spammers. Lemvotes is a single user server / spying tool to circumvent that reasonable expectation of user privacy.

            • skisnow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              It’s a UX issue. If you make votes public they should be very clearly so, the way reactions are on Facebook, LinkedIn etc, and everyone would be fine with it. What’s getting people’s panties in a twist is that Lemmy superficially presents itself as having anonymous voting but the logs are tucked away behind some convoluted process that you have to just know about and only seems to work about half the time.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          it works for some of the other instances; either it’s broken or selectively ignoring.