• underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        So he used an AI tool to “organize” references and it hallucinated crap that made it into the human-written article because he never reviewed the output for accuracy.

        This guy writes about AI for a living, he knows it hallucinates, and he even acknowledges the irony but never explains why he thought experimenting with AI was a good idea to begin with. Am I supposed to assume his judgment was impaired by being sick?

      • terminatortwo@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Thanks for linking this. I hope ars makes it more visible. I’ll have to take Benj’s word.

        That’s the thing with trust, hard to build, easy to burn.

    • doc@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I hope for more. If they don’t have something substantial very soon they’ve got some serious problems maintaining the standards they profess to have, and we all should question the validity of their content.