I distro hopped for a bit before finally settling in Debian (because Debian was always mentioned as a distro good for servers, or stable machines that are ok with outdated software)

And while I get that Debian does have software that isn’t as up to date, I’ve never felt that the software was that outdated. Before landing on Debian, I always ran into small hiccups that caused me issues as a new Linux user - but when I finally switched over to Debian, everything just worked! Especially now with Debian 13.

So my question is: why does Debian always get dismissed as inferior for everyday drivers, and instead mint, Ubuntu, or even Zorin get recommended? Is there something I am missing, or does it really just come down to people not wanting software that isn’t “cutting edge” release?

  • False@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Mesa has been the defacto standard for AMD for years. It’s always performed better than the official driver. AMD just made it their official recommendation recently.

    I think Intel also uses Mesa, with Nvidia being the odd one out

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Nvidia being the odd one out

      Right, I get that but also :

      top30cards

      (Source Steam Hardware & Software Survey: January 2026 )

      Entire top10, then for marketshare I don’t count NVIDIA I count the rest :

      AMD : ~15%

      Intel : ~6%

      I’m too lazy to guesstimate when it’s below 0.5% but you get the idea, at least 75% is NVIDIA.

      So “odd” yes but still a big deal in terms of market share for gamers.

      To be clear though I am NOT advocating for NVIDIA (especially with all their AI BS) just showing how dominating they are in that segment.