• woad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Couldn’t someone just browse by subscribed if they want to curate their feed?

    But I agree that, if communities could tag themselves by subject/category, there could be options to subscribe or block tags for people who like to browse the All feed.

    • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Couldn’t someone just browse by subscribed if they want to curate their feed?

      I agree with you, but it’s actually a complaint I’ve seen often, so I guess lots of people browse All

      PieFed has a feature like this and it’s well received

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like the groupings things but don’t find the pre subscribed all the useful. Part of it is until the federation is the main location to go for niched content it makes more sense to block what you don’t want than to subscribe to what you do. May always be like that given that its much easier for variations on the same thing to pop up (although piefed groups should handle that)

      • woad@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I tried piefed a while ago, liked the tags, but think they should be mandatory. I’m just not a big fan of the sign-up wizard, multi-coms or general vibe. Would still be cool if Lemmy had tags.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      that is indeed a good question. maybe if the community self-identifies as political? or maybe a majority vote? Or maybe it depends on the instance that you’re using? (something that the server admin can configure)

  • Bubs@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The only way I see something like this working is if communities had tags. Each community would select from a list of pre-determined tags based on the content posted there. Then, at any time, users can then block tags as they see fit.

    There would have to be some incentive to encourage communities to add the tags once they are implemented. The most fair way I can think of is to have a “None” tag that every community gets by default. Instances, or even apps can choose to hide untagged communities by default, and users can choose to hide them too. The incentive would come from the potential loss of visibility by not tagging your community.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It blocks 4 communities. Hardly seems worth it. Would love one of each for sports and memes which would need something close to what feels like a hundred communities for each.