Please refrain from sectarian drama and agitating against/mocking other socialists, even if you don’t always agree with them.

(Mocking succdems and reactionaries is fine, for further info please consult rule 3.)

From now on, Rule 1 will be better enforced against posts and comments including e.g. jabs at other socialists or needless incivility against them (dunk on the libs all you want, although constructive interaction and agitprop is also encouraged).
Silly pokes at each and constructive discussion/criticism are of course still allowed (with the latter being encouraged), just please abstain from more serious stuff against other socialists.

We also have new additions to the mod team!

Please welcome @Diva@lemmy.ml, @oculi@anarchist.nexus and @TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com as new moderators for this comm ^w^

We as a collective will try to look after better enforcement of the rules in terms of both posts and comments. However, we still encourage you to report things that break them.

Your @Diva@lemmy.ml, @Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com, @oculi@anarchist.nexus, @TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com and @alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com

  • алсааас [she/her]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I mean we don’t delete every lib comment, so as long as the person stays civil and doesn’t post outright false shit I would say no.
    If you get called an “ultra” or “shitlib” for memeing about e.g. China having taken the capitalist road or imperialist tendencies, then yes.
    (As long as you don’t CIA post, in which case some negative reaction would be justified).

    That’s my personal ad-hoc take. If it gets tricky it will likely be discussed by the mod team.