• A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    from the article :

    “In a 2024 paper, four AI researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology argued that these hints of convergence are no fluke.”

    Now, publish your own findings. No ? i didn’t think so either.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Why the hell would I waste my time studying such a lame, environmentally destructive, fundamentally anti-humanist technology?

      I am interested in generative potentials not dead ends.

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        i see your point and admire your resolute : there is a lot to be done without AI.

        Unfortunately technology is a one-way trap in my (par time intellectual’s) opinion. Also, on the one hand, we have multi billionaire_CEOs who do more to destroy the environment with help from technologies … and on the other hand, you could find scientists (with small to medium resources) discovering new medications and impressive stuff nowadays by & through, in part, the use of AI.

        We live in a complex world in which a diversity of approaches is quite valuable. So thanks for your standing and your contributions in society and at Lemmy.