• Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Because that sentence doesn’t really make sense. “Criteria” is a human concept. Nature doesn’t do “criteria”, nor “objective” for that matter. So, yes, there’s no “natural criteria” for when something is X or Y, we, humans, make those criteria. Doesn’t matter if it’s in relation to animals, plants, or planets.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The idea of a “category” is inherently human. Just like “objective” and “criteria”.

        Which means there is objective criteria for what is categorised as a planet - it’s whatever we, humans, define them to be.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Not objective in the sense that aliens would come to the same definition for what is and isn’t a planet. Compare that to something like what the elements are.