• UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s a pretty difficult claim to support because it requires you to make some pretty insane assumptions about what would have happened without NATO.

          • None of them. I think they are all equally capable of committing the crimes, but a gang is more dangerous than individual criminals acting on their own. So the gang [NATO] disbanding is a net positive.

      • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not difficult (except for Europeans and their settler counterpart) to understand that the world would be better off without NATO, your whiteness. “If it weren’t for NATO then it would’ve been anyone else!” isn’t the convincing claim you think it is. The burden of supporting such chickenshit non-claim is on you.

          • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, what’s your point? A terrorist organization ceasing to exist makes it slightly more difficult for European imperialist countries spearheaded by the largest imperialist, European settler-colony to collaborate and carry out their imperialist endeavors.