Categorically offensive and shameful. UK tribunal and US congress were overly political, based on interviews (heresay) where interviewees could have political or bribery motives. The accused crimes are pretty insignificant, and would permit political narratives that genocide is happening everywhere. But the core failure/flaw is accepting political propaganda for only basis of findings.
The resolution is based on sources that the world’s leading scholars on genocide deemed to be reliable. These are the same brave scholars who had the courage to stand up to Israel’s hasbara and overwhelming PR to name the genocide in Gaza. If that reality offends you, be offended. I have no time for genocide denialism.
Categorically offensive and shameful. UK tribunal and US congress were overly political, based on interviews (heresay) where interviewees could have political or bribery motives. The accused crimes are pretty insignificant, and would permit political narratives that genocide is happening everywhere. But the core failure/flaw is accepting political propaganda for only basis of findings.
The resolution is based on sources that the world’s leading scholars on genocide deemed to be reliable. These are the same brave scholars who had the courage to stand up to Israel’s hasbara and overwhelming PR to name the genocide in Gaza. If that reality offends you, be offended. I have no time for genocide denialism.
resolution listed their sources.
Indeed they did.