It pops up all the time, it’s a waste of time and I’m sure it has been used countless of times to discard some piece of information. It doesn’t add up anything productive to the comments, people who comment don’t even say anything they actually think they just “did you know that MBFC says this so it has to be truth?” I could go on but I think you get the idea.

  • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nothing you’ve said helps justify why adding more information is worse

    Because the additional information holds some random dipshits opinion on what is trustworthy and what not. When you see the “additional information” to show that something is trustworthy you read it uncritically

    • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Oh wow. You believe trustworthy means you shouldn’t read something uncritically? What an interesting world you live in

      • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        Yes i believe the majority of people that assume something is declared trustworthy read it uncritically. If you read my other comment it’s easier to assume everything is not trustworthy, so it forces you to read it critically. What an naive world you live in to not see this