• 73ms@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 小时前

    Nothing might be going too far. He left the board since it wasn’t good PR for them but Bluesky is not transparent about its ownership and Dorsey could well still have a stake in it.

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 小时前

      They have talked about some parts of it. They got funding from Twitter under his direction and got to keep the funds when Twitter bailed on their side of the contract as Musk bought it (the initial plan was to move Twitter to a new protocol)

      It’s a public benefit corporation. Jack can’t legally do much at all after having left the board

      • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 小时前

        yeah I’m aware… doesn’t really refute anything I said. If he holds a share then he can do what any investor can do and how much he can do depends on how big his share of the company is.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 小时前

          No, public benefit corporations specifically don’t work like that. They’re comparable to non profits in that manner

          • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 小时前

            They’re not. In practice PBC status doesn’t really limit them very much at all and is nothing like nonprofit.