BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 day agoAI-authored code contains worse bugs than software crafted by humanswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1194arrow-down1external-linkAI-authored code contains worse bugs than software crafted by humanswww.theregister.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBlaster M@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 day agoThe least you could do is proofread the code before subbing it.
minus-squarepivot_root@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoBut that takes skill and effort. Instead, just follow up the LLM prompt with, “and this doesn’t contain any vulnerabilities?” and submit the code while it’s still generating a response. If it finds one, log a ticket and deal with it next sprint. /s
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoThe AI proofread it and said it was great.
The least you could do is proofread the code before subbing it.
But that takes skill and effort. Instead, just follow up the LLM prompt with, “and this doesn’t contain any vulnerabilities?” and submit the code while it’s still generating a response. If it finds one, log a ticket and deal with it next sprint. /s
The AI proofread it and said it was great.