• Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    2 days ago

    Which only mean they aren’t a frog nor a pig, they’re an entirely new species where the male have a frog-like form and female have a pig-like form.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Maybe it’s a form of xenoparity like Messor ibericus, where one species is giving birth to an entirely separate species alongside its own.

      • jimmux@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        I never heard of xenoparity before, this is fascinating.

        Supposedly it only evolved about 5 million years ago, and some colonies still rely on external populations? Nature is constantly finding new ways to undermine our attempts to think we know how shit works.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Or they’re all chimeras, but the frog part is hemizygous (so has to express the gene) and the piggie part is X recessive heterozygous (so has another allele that can suppress the gene), and the gene controls which end of chimeric scale (frog to pig) the body tips

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        First, thank you for pointing this out. I had to go and fill my brain hole with a bunch of information about this absolutely fascinating discovery. I really thought you were discussing some science fiction concept initially.

        Second, what in the actual fuck did I just read?!?

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 days ago

      A form of sexual dimorphism. Honestly compared to real examples like the angler fish it’s not even that weird.