• Natanael@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    finally my manager said something about the bonuses has already been communicated and people would be angry to get less

    That’s because they have a fixed budget and the proportions are tied to evaluated performance tiers, increasing your rating would contractually require them to compensate you more from the same pool of money

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You’re falling for the “we’ve constructed this machine to tell you no so you can’t argue with us” ploy

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Nah, that’s bogus. It’s a private company, they can do what they want. They could have absolutely given OP the 5/5 rating, and just had them sign something saying that they were content with the bonus appropriate to a 4/5 rating. No one would have had to receive a penny less.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s very annoying to have managers say their hands are tied when they very well could go to bat for you with their superiors. I was lucky to have one manager really push for me in the past like that. It’s rare.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That fixed budget is what they always say. The budget for the company is their problem, not yours.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, no shit, thank you for repeating what I said. The point being I never cared about the money and didn’t even understand it was only about the money. I only wanted recognition.