- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
Wait unti you have to upgrade Zorin to a new release. I still haven’t gotten mine to work. Stick with Mint or Bazzite if you want a Windows alternate
I’ve had Zorin on an old laptop for a few years now, it’s pretty good. I’d previously tried Mint and another distro I can’t remember the name of, but I’ve stuck with Zorin. I’ll probably go with it on my PC once I’ve done a backup.
Amazing how lemmings will find a way to jump off of any cliff.
“Free OS that works great?”
NO! I WANT TO PAY.
Free as in Freedom and not free as in beer. I donate to a lot of open-source projects such as KDE.
I’m mostly amazed that they discovered it. When I think of a good transition distro this is not what comes to mind. Must have been some kind of targeted ad campaign. Also there’s probably a ton of people that think no good software could possibly be free.
They’ve been astroturfing the fuck out of it for the last 6 weeks.
This was my guess. This shit doesn’t come from nowhere. My bet is that some big wig or VC backed it and is trying to get ROI.
Zorin? Its a great transition distro. Clean aesthetic, with back end gnome tweaks so you can have it look like KDE/windows. Software store made easy. Everything seems to work OOTB.
I mean, I don’t mind monetization if it keeps the project alive and they’re actually doing work. I do mind free stuff that comes at the price of your data, or free stuff that is eventually bought up, or free stuff that can’t sustain itself and constantly splits off and churns through personal drama cycles.
so your going with pro then?
It’s honestly like that with free mobile apps. You either find a paid version or you install free abandonware riddled with ads.
Or you look on fdroid…
If windows users want to pay for a superior OS even though they don’t have to, let them.
Ha, didn’t realise Zorin was paid for. I’ll stick with Debian. Not only is it free, it was made for lesbians who I also whole heartedly support.
Hahah, I can’t tell if this comment is queer, or neckbeard. X)
I hope they find Mint soon. Zorin never worked well for me.
How does Zorin compare to Mint?
Prettier but has a track record of having more technical issues. Also the devs are a company with absolutely no transparency. At some point there was so few communication that I thought they closed shop.
If you want a similar UI, I would advise going for a vanilla Gnome and adding the desired “Zorin *” extensions. It’s a bunch more work to setup but it feels more trustworthy to me.
More glitz and glam than many other distros I’ve tried. It was the first one I tried when trying to leave Windows. Eventually did Mint, Pop, Nobara, and Garuda. Chose Mint to stick with for now and haven’t regretted it.
If one of my less savvy friends asked about switching to Linux, I would mention Zorin as a possible option simply because it goes out of its way to feel familiar.
Thanks! I got the feeling that it was trying to feel like windows to ease the pain of transition. I’ve just seen several hype posts for it recently and wondered what was up.
Uses Gnome instead of Cinnamon, has a paid version, that’s all the differences I can think of
out of box distro so it comes with a bunch of software pre installed. .
Nearly a million in less than 3 months for a distro I’ve never heard of before? Cap.
It looks pretty dogshit to me, and the pricing model tries to mimic windows. “but is donation!!” even if it’s a “donation” the titles are misleading because of their correlations.
It’s a manipulative tactic to try to convince your users otherwise. I found another case of this “donation” thing from the administrators of a community trying to deceive their users.
If you don’t stop this snake behaviour I will luigi the fuck out of you. Don’t touch linux with your dirty hands you scum.
Where have you been? Lol. Its been quite popular in Linux discussions I have seen around the COVID era. Started in 2009/2010 Used to have a suggested fee and you’d just type how much you wanted to pay, even $0. Looks like they now specifically set it into separate downloads , free for core version and money for preinstalled apps.
Zorin’s been around for years. I’ve only ever used the free version. It’s okay, but I think Mint is a better transition between Windows and Linux.
I’ve been using Nobara as my first distro for the past couple months. It’s been braindead easy and I haven’t had any issues aside from Steam Remote play refusing to work.
I’ve heard of Zorin before. It’s been around for a while, but last I heard anything was years ago. There’s not been much hype or anything since.
ive used it for years but yeah seems like with 18 they are trying to leverage windows 11 popularity to increase users.
Why does Zorin exist?
Linux Mint exists to be defuckulated Ubuntu, and to show off the Cinnamon desktop which is defuckulated Gnome.
Neon is KDE’s in-house distro, because I guess they get to have one even if it is functionally identical to Kubuntu.
Manjaro is Arch that’s ready to go out of the box.
What is Zorin for? Do they develop any software, or do they charge money for re-themed Ubuntu Gnome?
It’s a defuckulated Ubuntu with a a dozen custom Gnome extensions. They do publish the extensions code. It exists because Mint is often ugly and not very ergonomic. See the “file” apps for both distros, Mint’s buttons are too small and the progress indicator is a tiny 16px icon in the status bar.
please do not suggest that manajaro is arch ready to use arch. manjaro is just bad. if you want easier to install arch go endeavour os or cachy or some other arch plus gui installer. https://manjarno.pages.dev/
I, personally, think Omarchy is the best “easier to install Arch” out there - you can hand out a flashdrive to anyone with at least the most basic IT-knowledge and they would get a working, useable and upgradeable system within ~20 minutes.
I said that’s the reason Manjaro exists, not that it’s any good at it.
Nobody has answered me what Zorin is for.
No wonder Windows users switched to it - Core, Pro and Education editions, each with a cost? That’s Windows in a Linux jumpsuit
Core is free. And then you install the apps to make it like Pro. Some people like everything done for them, and some businesses won’t approve free software for use, as it has a stigma of being sketchy, so adding a paid version can get this past your chief technical officer at a corporation.
The Pro edition is basically a donate button that gets you a few themes and applications that you can just as easily install from Flathub.
The answer to your question which sounds like a statment is no.
