Foundation says it won’t compromise policy of inclusivity even if that cash would’ve really helped

    • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “We think you’ve hired too many black people, you now owe us millions of dollars.”

      The fact that having money and simply convincing someone to accept it with terms means someone gets to do that in this system is fucking wretched.

      • xorollo@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 month ago

        You refuse to implement a back door for us in all of your cryptography modules, so we say you hired too many black people and now you owe us the money back.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It depends.

            For many ‘new’ MAGA conservatives, its kind of a means to an end, yeah. It a part of the culture of feeling victimized. Its why so many bristle at being called racists as a blanket term: they actually aren’t.

            But there are certainly old\ gheezers (many leaders) or perpetually online influencers that are legit racists. Or “great replacement theory” tangential believers that really straddle the line.

            • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 month ago

              One of the most unnerving things about rightism is that there seem to be separate versions of the ideology, tailored to specific classes, for the purpose of perpetuating a cycle of abuse and obedience.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Well that’s true of many political “sides,” historical and extant, unfortunately.

                See: Lemmygrad.

                I think the lesson is to not believe in ideologies so rigidly, and to not revere individual leaders/influencers to such an extent.

                • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  To be fair, by the classical definition of left and right (equality vs hierarchy), tankies are right wingers. Authoritarianism is very much a rightist ideology. In fact, i would even argue that things like the “Cultural Revolution” in China were fascist because they demanded absolute loyalty to the state and its ideology on threat of violence. They just hate the other right wingers a lot because the nations they cheer for have been enemies of what I will loosely call “The West”, so they didn’t absorb the beliefs that commonly define western right wingers in the modern age.